← FORTRESS AMB REGIONALS

Water Ravishing MillTier 1

at FORTRESS AMB REGIONALS

decks
8 (8.0% of field)
matches (non-mirror)
41 23-12-6
overall winrate
63.4%
ELO-adjusted winrate
57.4% avg ELO +2.6 per match
expected value
56.4% share-weighted (raw)
EV (ELO-adj)
53.8% share-weighted (skill-controlled)
Pilot Skill ↑ top
mean ELO 1404 · median 1385 · range 1127–1642 (8 pilots with an ELO rating)
989 Q1 1186 Q3 1422 1685
50% of pilots are in the field's top quartile, 12% in the bottom. This deck is favored by stronger players — weight the headline winrates accordingly (the ELO-adjusted column already controls for this at the match level).
Head-to-Head Matchups

Winrates vs every other archetype, sorted by the opponent's field share. Mirrors excluded. Shrunk WR uses a Beta(2, 2) prior so a 1-0 cell doesn't read as 100%; it feeds the EV calc above. Adj WR is the skill-controlled view: derived from per-match ELO deltas (0.5 + avg ELO Δ / K=32, same shrinkage), so it tells you what would have happened on equal-rating play. A faded Raw WR means under 10 matches — lean on the Shrunk WR column there.

Opponent Their share Matches W-L-D Raw WR Shrunk WR Adj WR ELO Δ/match
Slimes 13.0% 3 2-1-0 66.7% 57.1% 52.3% +1.7
Wind Astra Cleric 13.0% 10 5-2-3 65.0% 60.7% 61.9% +5.3
Fire Aggro 12.0% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 60.8% +8.1
Wind Allies 10.0% 7 1-3-3 35.7% 40.9% 38.1% -6.0
Fire Crux Mage 8.0% 3 3-0-0 100.0% 71.4% 69.7% +14.7
Water Penguin Mill 7.0% 4 1-3-0 25.0% 37.5% 37.7% -7.9
Wind Shadowstrike 5.0% 1 0-1-0 0.0% 40.0% 46.2% -6.0
Water Allies 4.0% 3 1-2-0 33.3% 42.9% 46.2% -2.8
Fire Slimes 3.0% 2 2-0-0 100.0% 66.7% 56.9% +6.6
Wind Razorgale 3.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 59.7% +15.5
Fire Exia 2.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.4% +13.4
Fire Luxem Assassin 1.0% 0
Fire Polkhawk 1.0% 0
Fire Ravishing Mill 1.0% 0
Water Astra Cleric 1.0% 0
Water Crux Mage 1.0% 0
Water Slimes 1.0% 0
Water Umbra Ranger 1.0% 0
Wind Crux Mage 1.0% 0
Wind Crux Merlin 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 53.8% +6.1
Wind Lorraine 1.0% 0
Wind Neos 1.0% 0
Wind Slimes 1.0% 0
Wind Tera Silvie 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 54.1% +6.5
Wind Umbra Ranger 1.0% 1 1-0-0 100.0% 60.0% 58.0% +12.7
Decklists · 8 from this event
Mirror Analysis

In 2 mirror matches (1 draw excluded), here are the card-count differences that most often separated the winning deck from the losing one. Staples (cards both decks run at the same count) are filtered out — only flex slots show up below. Cards whose count only differed in fewer than 3 mirrors are also held back as too sparse to call a pattern (still visible in the raw table further down). Small sample warning: 2 mirrors is borderline; treat these as suggestive, not conclusive.

No card differed in at least 3 of the 2 mirrors we have. The raw table below has the sparse signals that didn't clear the threshold — treat them as noise unless the sample grows.

Show all 14 cards with non-zero signal (raw numbers, including 14 held back from the grid above)
Card Edge In winner In loser Same Direction
Frozen Dismissal +1.00 2 0 0
Viridian Protective Trinket +1.00 2 0 0
Rippleback Terrapin -1.00 0 2 0
Mystic Purifier +1.00 2 0 0
Glacial Evocation -1.00 0 2 0
Vaporjet Shield -1.00 0 2 0
Safeguard Amulet -1.00 0 2 0
Song of Frost -0.50 0 1 1
Frostbind +0.50 1 0 1
Hailstorm Guard +0.50 1 0 0
Torrential Blast +0.50 1 0 0
Seaside Ringleader +0.50 1 0 1
Ravishing Finale -0.50 0 1 1
Tidal Lock -0.50 0 1 1

JSON: /api/events/17571/archetypes/Water Ravishing Mill